• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Housing Technology logo

Housing Technology

Housing | IT | Telecoms | Business | Ecology

  • Free Subscription
  • Search Archive
  • Home
  • Research
  • Magazine
  • Events
  • Recruitment
  • Blog
  • On Demand
  • Contact
Home / Free Subscriber Access / Procurement fallacies

Procurement fallacies

IT and business procurements should be fairly empirical exercises, free as far as possible from subjective and personal judgements. However, given our innate human fallibilities, that’s rarely the case. Given the importance of IT procurement to housing providers’ operations, we thought it would be enlightening to consider some of the most common procurement fallacies.

• Sunk costs – These are costs that you’ve already paid and can’t get back, with the fallacy resulting in IT or business projects being continued only because of the previously-spent (sunk) costs, in spite of the intended benefits no longer likely to be achieved. To use an everyday example, imagine you’ve bought (non-refundable) tickets to a film but after watching it for ten minutes you decide that you really aren’t enjoying the film; do you stay until the very end because you’ve paid for the tickets, or leave and use the remaining time to do something more enjoyable?
• Confirmation bias – We each have a tendency to focus on things that reinforce our existing beliefs and ignore evidence or arguments that undermine those beliefs. In the context of procurement, we might believe, for example, that ‘well-known IT supplier’ simply must be better than one we’ve heard less about; we would then frame our post-hoc procurement arguments accordingly, in spite of what might be in the respective suppliers’ tender responses.
• False dilemma – This is the misleading idea that the procurement will be sub-optimal, regardless of the decision-making process. For example, when selecting a potential IT supplier, you might think or be told, “If we go with the lowest price bid, the service will probably be terrible; and if we decide to pick the best service offer, we will pay through the nose.” The goal of each procurement exercise should be to find the best overall value for the proposed price (i.e. the optimal TCO); the value is a fair price that we are willing to pay for the best quality product or service.
• Hasty generalisation – This fallacy is based on applying a small, unrepresentative sample or opinion to a much larger situation. For instance, when deciding which companies to include in the request for tender, someone might say, “We’ve tried to get quotes from this company once before, but their prices were too high, and the quality is questionable; they should therefore be excluded.” This is flawed reasoning (and unethical); no suppliers should be excluded from getting your business just because they didn’t win previous bids.

See More On:

  • Topic: General News
  • Publication Date: 085 - January 2022
  • Type: Editor's Notes

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent Articles

  • Free cyber-defence tools from NCSC
  • Learning from history
  • Grand Union Housing gets connected with Aico HomeLink
  • The silences in the system: Predicting and preventing damp and mould
  • Looking back and to the future: Cyberthreats in social housing
  • Hyde signs repairs contract with Totalmobile
  • Fuelling high performance automation
  • Morgan Sindall’s Carbon Zero decarbonisation tool
  • An ethical approach to arrears
  • Housing and the ever-evolving workplace
  • Supporting residents with home safety risks
  • Less innovation & more service design at RHP
  • Ateb Group outsources IT help desks to Central Networks
  • Capital Letters partners with Evo Digital to tackle homelessness
  • Calico appoints M247 for digital transformation
  • 24/7 care requires 24/7 technology
  • Govtech trends for 2023
  • Are you ready for business process automation?
  • Lincoln council moves to the cloud with Civica
  • Why do IT business improvement projects fail?
  • Flagship and Ebrik launch augmented reality app
  • Following the golden thread
  • Setting the standard for carbon-monoxide protection
  • The business case for data
  • Digital twins – When, not if…
  • Using data to build communities
  • The cyber-security jigsaw’s missing piece – Managed detection & response
  • Cyber-security challenges in housing
  • Digitalising retrofits with SHDF & HomeLink
  • Tips for improving care and support

Footer

Housing Technology
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Contact
  • Free Subscription
  • Book an event
  • Blog
  • Search All Articles
  • Research
  • Update Your Subscription
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome to the housing Technology – Trusted Information For Business Professionals in HOusing

Housing Technology is the leading technology information service for the UK housing sector and local governments. We have always believed in the fundamental importance of how the UK’s social housing providers use technology to improve their tenants’ lives.

Subscribe to Housing Technology to gain market-leading research, unsurpassed peer networking opportunities and a greater understanding of your role to transform your business.

Copyright © The Intelligent Business Company 2022 | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
Housing Technology is published by the The Intelligent Business Company. A company with limited liability. Registered in England No. 4958057 | Vat Registion No. 833 0069 55.

Registered Business Address: Hoppingwood Farm, Robin Hood Way, London, SW20 0AB | Telephone: +44 (0) 20 8336 2293

htc23 pop banner