• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Housing Technology logo

Housing Technology

Housing | IT | Telecoms | Business | Ecology

  • Free Subscription
  • Search Archive
  • Home
  • Research
  • Magazine
  • Events
  • Recruitment
  • Blog
  • On Demand
  • Contact
Home / Magazine Articles / Estate regeneration is part of the 21st century – let’s make it feel that way

Estate regeneration is part of the 21st century – let’s make it feel that way

Commonplace was recently included in the London Mayor’s good practice guide for estate regeneration, which gives us genuine pride. But more importantly, it indicates that times really are changing. More and more frequently I hear acknowledgement and even genuine enthusiasm from councils, property developers and housing providers about the need for communities to be at the centre of estate regeneration. And it feels like more than a passing fad for three important reasons:

Residents can no longer be removed from the nub of the discussion, because they have an array of online tools to protest if they feel marginalised. In addition, they are emboldened by sophisticated campaign groups such as ASH.

The political and professional mood is changing, spurred by leadership from the London Mayor and encouraged by evidence from think-tanks such as Create Streets and respected practitioners such as Daisy Froud.

The scale of the impending house-building requirement is sinking in, and it’s clear that to achieve anything near volume needed, developers need residents to be supportive (which was underlined in Centre for London’s recent report, ‘Stopped’).

The mood music is starting to embrace the idea that high-quality, inclusive community engagement is fundamentally necessary for successful estate regeneration. Housing providers will argue, some with good reason, that they have always worked to this principle. What I think is changing is the meaning of ‘high quality, inclusive community engagement’, 17 years into the 21st century.

I believe there are three elements to this changing definition of quality. All of them are for the better and are now becoming de-facto best-practice.

First, residents and local communities must be a central component of all processes designed to establish the objectives of a regeneration project. Their views are often not sought until there is a proposal, or set of proposal options put forward. In our experience, it is already too late to conduct meaningful engagement if there has been no prior discussion of substance about needs and objectives between the estate owner and the community. This necessitates an open conversation with residents about their views, needs, ideas and aspirations at the earliest possible moment in the project. I believe that a ‘statement of community need’ should be co-produced by the community and the owner at the very beginning of every project.

Second, transparency is fundamental to creating and maintaining trust in a regeneration process. Trust is famously hard to win and very easy to lose, and that has never been truer than in these projects. Ensuring that the process (e.g. timeline, events and decision points) is transparent to residents is relatively common. But making the community responses and insight transparent is much less common and leads to unnecessary loss of trust. Every comment made by a member of the community should be available publicly, in order to demonstrate that nothing is being hidden. Taking anything but this approach creates friction that tends to result in the breakdown of trust.

Third, there should be an ‘always on’ opportunity for residents to participate and respond, so that they are not limited by the constraints of particular events. This is essential to ensure a high response rate and to maximise participation by those who are time poor and therefore less likely to attend events. But it has another even more important effect; it underlines the fact that everyone’s view and participation is equally important. In order to achieve this, I believe that digital engagement must be an integral component of any engagement process with residents, however that is achieved.

Many organisations and projects are adopting these principles. Our work with housing providers such as Peabody, Genesis and Poplar Harca demonstrates their enthusiasm and commitment. There is a fantastic opportunity in the rush to create new housing, which could radically update expectations of community engagement in development projects. Using these new and emerging tools, blended with face-to-face discussion and events, every resident should have the expectation of being a partner in these projects.

In my view, this is what we should all reasonably expect of estate regeneration in the 21st century, in order to deliver housing and improve community cohesion on estates.

Mike Saunders is CEO of Commonplace.

See More On:

  • Vendor: Commonplace
  • Topic: Housing Management
  • Publication Date: 057 - May 2017
  • Type: Contributed Articles

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent Articles

  • Free cyber-defence tools from NCSC
  • Learning from history
  • Grand Union Housing gets connected with Aico HomeLink
  • The silences in the system: Predicting and preventing damp and mould
  • Looking back and to the future: Cyberthreats in social housing
  • Hyde signs repairs contract with Totalmobile
  • Fuelling high performance automation
  • Morgan Sindall’s Carbon Zero decarbonisation tool
  • An ethical approach to arrears
  • Housing and the ever-evolving workplace
  • Supporting residents with home safety risks
  • Less innovation & more service design at RHP
  • Ateb Group outsources IT help desks to Central Networks
  • Capital Letters partners with Evo Digital to tackle homelessness
  • Calico appoints M247 for digital transformation
  • 24/7 care requires 24/7 technology
  • Govtech trends for 2023
  • Are you ready for business process automation?
  • Lincoln council moves to the cloud with Civica
  • Why do IT business improvement projects fail?
  • Flagship and Ebrik launch augmented reality app
  • Following the golden thread
  • Setting the standard for carbon-monoxide protection
  • The business case for data
  • Digital twins – When, not if…
  • Using data to build communities
  • The cyber-security jigsaw’s missing piece – Managed detection & response
  • Cyber-security challenges in housing
  • Digitalising retrofits with SHDF & HomeLink
  • Tips for improving care and support

Footer

Housing Technology
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Contact
  • Free Subscription
  • Book an event
  • Blog
  • Search All Articles
  • Research
  • Update Your Subscription
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome to the housing Technology – Trusted Information For Business Professionals in HOusing

Housing Technology is the leading technology information service for the UK housing sector and local governments. We have always believed in the fundamental importance of how the UK’s social housing providers use technology to improve their tenants’ lives.

Subscribe to Housing Technology to gain market-leading research, unsurpassed peer networking opportunities and a greater understanding of your role to transform your business.

Copyright © The Intelligent Business Company 2022 | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
Housing Technology is published by the The Intelligent Business Company. A company with limited liability. Registered in England No. 4958057 | Vat Registion No. 833 0069 55.

Registered Business Address: Hoppingwood Farm, Robin Hood Way, London, SW20 0AB | Telephone: +44 (0) 20 8336 2293

htc23 pop banner